Skip to main content
APRIL 28, 2020
One of the things which led to Covid-19 becoming a catastrophic situation has revealed to be the choices that were made before the pandemic. Regardless of whether these choices were good or not, they were nevertheless made. This therefore leads to the question of how catastrophes influence decision-making in uncertain situations. Theories are able to clearly explain our choices when we have all the elements in hand. However, once exceptional situations occur, such as catastrophes that have disastrous yet very unlikely consequences, these theories reveal to be less pertinent.
Read the article on
https://www.dialogueseconomiques.fr/en/article/decisions-periods-uncertainty-fear-and-catastrophe

Latest publications

When Cancer Doesn’t Stop People From Smoking
Why do some people keep smoking, even when a loved one has become seriously ill because of tobacco? A study based on 200,000 people in France shows that these “family shocks” have very little impact on behaviour. The findings raise questions about the effectiveness of prevention policies.
How matrimonial ads reveal the evolution of our ideals about love
The France Culture program “Avec Sciences,” about the work of Quentin Lippmann (AMU/AMSE)
Economic precarity compounds the harms of homophobia
An article from "L'Observatoire des inégalités" in France, on the work of Bruno Ventelou (CNRS/AMSE)