Lubrano

Publications

Recent advances in Bayesian econometricsJournal articleLuc Bauwens, Michel Lubrano et Herman K. van Dijk, Journal of Econometrics, Volume 123, Issue 2, pp. 197-199, 2004

No abstract is available for this item.

Ranking Economics Departments in Europe: A Statistical ApproachJournal articleMichel Lubrano, Luc Bauwens, Alan Kirman et Camelia Protopopescu, Journal of the European Economic Association, Volume 1, Issue 6, pp. 1367-1401, 2003

We provide a ranking of economics departments in Europe and we discuss the methods used to obtain it. TheJEL CD-ROM serves as a database for a period covering ten years. Journals are ranked using a combination of expert opinions and citation data to produce a scale from 1 to 10. The publication output and habits of fifteen European countries plus California are then compared. Individuals with a contribution greater than a predetermined minimum level are regrouped into departments which are ranked according to their total scores. A standard deviation is provided to underline the uncertainty of this ranking. (JEL: I29, D63, C12, C14) Copyright (c) 2003 The European Economic Association.

Bayesian option pricing using asymmetric GARCH modelsJournal articleMichel Lubrano et Luc Bauwens, Journal of Empirical Finance, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp. 321-342, 2002

This paper shows how one can compute option prices from a Bayesian inference view point, using a GARCH model for the dynamics of the the volatility of the underlying asset. The proposed evaluation of an option is the predictive expectation of its payoff function. The predictive distribution of this function provides a natural metric, provided it is neutralised with respect to the risk, for gauging the predictive option price or other option evaluations. The proposed method is compared to the Black and Scholes evaluation, in which a marginal mean volatility is plugged, but which does not provide a natural metric. The methods are illustrated using symmetric, asymmetric and smooth transition GARCH models with data on a stock index in Brussels.

Bayesian Inference in Dynamic Econometric ModelsBookLuc Bauwens, Michel Lubrano et Jean-François Richard, OUP Catalogue - Advanced Texts in Econometrics, 2000, 366 pages, Oxford University Press, 2000

This book contains an up-to-date coverage of the last twenty years advances in Bayesian inference in econometrics, with an emphasis on dynamic models. It shows how to treat Bayesian inference in non linear models, by integrating the useful developments of numerical integration techniques based on simulations (such as Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods), and the long available analytical results of Bayesian inference for linear regression models. It thus covers a broad range of rather recent models for economic time series, such as non linear models, autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic regressions, and cointegrated vector autoregressive models. It contains also an extensive chapter on unit root inference from the Bayesian viewpoint. Several examples illustrate the methods.

Bayesian inference on GARCH models using the Gibbs samplerJournal articleLuc Bauwens et Michel Lubrano, Econometrics Journal, Volume 1, Issue Conferenc, pp. C23-C46, 1998

This paper explains how the Gibbs sampler can be used to perform Bayesian inference on GARCH models. Although the Gibbs sampler is usually based on the analyti-cal knowledge of the full conditional posterior densities, such knowledge is not available in regression models with GARCH errors. We show that the Gibbs sampler can be combined with a unidimensional deterministic integration rule applied to each coordinate of the poste-rior density. The full conditional densities are evaluated and inverted numerically to obtain random draws of the joint posterior. The method is shown to be feasible and competitive compared with importance sampling and the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. It is applied to estimate an asymmetric Student-GARCH model for the return on a stock exchange index, and to compute predictive option prices on the index. We prove, moreover, that a flat prior on the degrees of freedom parameter leads to an improper posterior density.

Unit roots tests and SARIMA modelsJournal articleMichel Lubrano et Fabrice Barthélémy, Economics Letters, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp. 147-154, 1996

No abstract is available for this item.

Real Wages, Quantity Constraints and Equilibrium Unemployment: Belgium, 1955-1988Journal articleMichel Lubrano, Fatemeh Shadman-Mehta et Henri R. Sneessens, Empirical Economics, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp. 427-57, 1996

This paper examines the determinants of equilibrium wage and unemployment rates in Belgium within the framework of a quantity rationing, right-to-manage model with decentralised wage setting. Empirical results are obtained by first using the Johansen maximum-likelihood procedure for the analysis of cointegration among the variables of interest. The information from this stage is then used to estimate a three-equation econometric model explaining the wage-share, the unemployment rate and the capital gap. The slowdown in world trade is depicted as the most important factor explaining the rise in unemployment in Belgium, with dampening effects due to wage control policies imposed in the eighties. Because we obtain only two cointegrating relations, for three endogenous variables, our results are compatible with the hypothesis of path dependency and multiple equilibria.

Editors' introduction Bayesian and classical econometric modeling of time seriesJournal articleLuc Bauwens et Michel Lubrano, Journal of Econometrics, Volume 69, Issue 1, pp. 1-4, 1995

No abstract is available for this item.

Testing for unit roots in a Bayesian frameworkJournal articleMichel Lubrano, Journal of Econometrics, Volume 69, Issue 1, pp. 81-109, 1995

No abstract is available for this item.

Bayesian Diagnostics for HeterogeneityJournal articleLuc Bauwens et Michel Lubrano, Annals of Economics and Statistics, Issue 20-21, pp. 17-40, 1991

In this paper we examine the problem of testing for heterogeneity and heterosckedasticity in a Bayesian framework. We first show that a model with random coefficients is identical to a model with heteroskedastic residuals. We then consider two approaches for testing. The first one is concerned with the point of view of misspecification. The original model is homoskedastic. One is willing to detect any departure from homoskedasticity. We propose diagnostics based on the examination of the Bayesian residuals, after stressing the differences between classical and Bayesian residuals. In the second approach, the starting point is a precise form of the alternative hypothesis, and the model for inference is heteroskedastic. A test for homoskedasticity is then a test for a parameter restriction. This can be done by looking at highest posterior probability regions or by the use of the posterior odds ratio. As a joint product, we develop the posterior analysis of a heteroskedastic regression model for several classes of prior distributions.