BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//AMSE//Event Calendar//FR
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event-12538@amse-aixmarseille.fr
DTSTAMP:20260414T111520Z
CREATED:20260414T111520Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260414T111520Z
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:phd seminar - Xavier Chatron-Colliet*\, Valentin Burban**
DTSTART:20260324T100000Z
DTEND:20260324T113000Z
DESCRIPTION:*The literature on subjective well-being (SWB) or "happiness ec
 onomics" has developed around a hedonic approach\, measuring well-being thr
 ough life satisfaction and the balance of affects. Although its conceptual 
 foundations date back to the 1990s\, the notion of eudaimonia has attracted
  growing interest over the past decade. This theoretical shift\, initiated 
 by the work of Carol Ryff as early as 1989\, emerged in opposition to a con
 ception of happiness limited to the mere experience of pleasure and the sat
 isfaction of preferences. While the literature on subjective well-being pri
 marily focuses on measuring life satisfaction\, the eudaimonic approach als
 o emphasizes the quality of individuals’ psychological functioning. In pr
 actice\, however\, the assessment of eudaimonia is often reduced to the sol
 e measurement of meaning in life in survey instruments. One hypothesis\, we
 ll documented in the literature\, is that this simplification stems from a 
 lack of theoretical consensus\, linked to a fragmented proliferation of emp
 irical measures\, which in turn creates an epistemological gap that weakens
  the applicability of these studies for public policy purposes. In response
  to this fragmentation\, we propose returning to the Aristotelian roots of 
 the concept. From this perspective\, eudaimonia cannot be reduced to a form
  of psychological functioning that is autonomous from the external world. O
 n the contrary\, we argue that eudaimonia is inseparable from the living co
 nditions and social contingencies within which individuals operate. To addr
 ess these challenges\, this article proposes to articulate the concepts of 
 eudaimonia and agency by bridging Amartya Sen’s capability approach with 
 Self-Determination Theory.**This paper examines how sovereign yield curves 
 react to natural disasters using a panel of advanced and emerging economies
 . It analyzes changes in the level\, slope\, and curvature of the yield cur
 ve and decomposes long-term yields into expected short rates and term premi
 a. The results show that large disasters generate stronger and more persist
 ent interest rate responses\, particularly in emerging markets. Climate vul
 nerability plays an important role in explaining cross-country differences:
  more vulnerable countries tend to experience larger increases in borrowing
  costs following disasters. Overall\, the findings suggest that financial m
 arkets incorporate both the economic impact of disasters and countries’ s
 tructural exposure to climate risk when pricing sovereign debt.\\n\\nContac
 t: Xavier Chatron-Colliet : xavier.chatron-colliet[at]univ-amu.frArmand Rig
 otti : armand.rigotti[at]univ-amu.fr\n\nPlus d'informations: https://amse-
 aixmarseille.fr/fr/evenements/armand-rigotti-xavier-chatron-colliet
LOCATION:MEGA - Salle Carine Nourry\, 424\, Chemin du Viaduc\, 13080 Aix-en
 -Provence
URL;VALUE=URI:https://amse-aixmarseille.fr/fr/evenements/armand-rigotti-xavier-chatron-colliet
CONTACT:Xavier Chatron-Colliet : xavier.chatron-colliet[at]univ-amu.frArman
 d Rigotti :&nbsp\;armand.rigotti[at]univ-amu.fr
TRANSP:OPAQUE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR